Title Usporedba različitih metoda programiranja VIIT-a kratkog formata
Title (english) Comparison of different methods to prescribe HIIT
Author Tin Juričić
Mentor Jere Gulin (mentor)
Committee member Jere Gulin (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee member Vlatko Vučetić (član povjerenstva)
Committee member Daniel Bok (član povjerenstva)
Granter University of Zagreb Faculty of Kinesiology Zagreb
Defense date and country 2024-09-27, Croatia
Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline SOCIAL SCIENCES Kinesiology
Abstract Intenzitet aktivnosti najvažnija je akutna varijabla koju treba odrediti za izazivanje željene fiziološke adaptacije tijekom treninga izdržljivosti. Intenzitet VIIT-a najčešće se određuje kroz postotak MAB-a. Međutim nogometaši tijekom utakmice provode značajan dio vremena na intenzitetima iznad vVO2max, odnosno MAB-a. VIIT kratkog formata se također provodi intenzitetom koji prelazi MAB, stoga metoda koja koristi postotak MAB-a možda i nije najbolji izbor za programiranje individualiziranog VIIT-a. Metode programiranja koje koriste postotke vIFT-a i kombinaciju postotka ASR-a uzimaju u obzir i intenzitete iznad MAB-a, te kao takve imaju veći potencijal za programiranje individualiziranog VIIT-a kratkog formata. Cilj ovog istraživanja je utvrditi postoji li razlika u akutnoj reakciji nogometaša između vremenski definiranog VIIT-a programiranog koristeći postotak vIFT-a i treninga koji koristi postotak ASR-a. Pored toga, utvrditi koja će metoda programiranja VIIT-a biti superiornija u akumulaciji veće količine vremena u zoni ≥90% FSmax, uz što manji metabolički i percepcijski stres. Petnaest visoko treniranih nogometaša (dobi 20,33 ± 2,23 godina, visine 184,43 ± 5,88 cm i težine 76,63 ± 5,07 kg) odradili su dva VIIT-a u trajanju od 10 minuta koji su uključivali interval rada u trajanju od 15 sekundi na intenzitetima od 95% vIFT-a i 20%ASR-a (MAB + 20% ASR), te interval pasivnog odmora istog trajanja. Oba treninga rezultirala su visokim postotkom akumulacije vremena u zoni ≥90% FSmax. Međutim bez statistički značajne razlike između metoda programiranja VIIT-a u kardiorespiratornim p = 0,46 (t@90%FSmax), metaboličkim p = 0,58 (La) i percepcijskim p = 0,07 (SPOt) parametrima akutne reakcije.
Abstract (english) Exercise intensity is the most important acute variable that needs to be determined for inducing the desired physiological adaptation during endurance training. HIIT intensity is most commonly prescribed using percentage of MAS. However, soccer players spend a significant portion of their time during a match at intensities above vVO2max, or MAS. Short format HIIT is also performed at an intensity that exceeds MAS, so a method based on a percentage of MAS might not be the best choice for designing individualized HIIT. Methods that use percentages of vIFT and a combination of ASR percentage take into account intensities above MAS and, as such, have greater potential for designing individualized short format HIIT. The aim of this research is to determine if there is a difference in the acute response of soccer players between time - defined HIIT designed using a percentage of vIFT and training that uses a percentage of ASR. In addition, the study aims to determine which method will be superior in accumulating a greater amount of time in the ≥90% HRmax zone with minimal metabolic and perceptual stress. Fifteen highly trained soccer players (age 20.33 ± 2.23 years, height 184.43 ± 5.88 cm, and weight 76.63 ± 5.07 kg) completed two 10-minute HIIT sessions, each consisting of 15-second work intervals at intensities of 95% vIFT and 20% ASR (MAS + 20% ASR), followed by 15-second passive recovery. Both methods resulted in a high percentage of time accumulated in the ≥90% HRmax zone. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the methods in terms of cardiorespiratory p = 0.46 (t@90%HRmax), metabolic p = 0.58 (La), and perceptual p = 0.07 (RPE) acute response.
Keywords
anaerobna sprinterska rezerva
maksimalni doseg u 30 – 15 intermittent fitness testu
nogomet
akutna reakcija
individualizirani trening
Keywords (english)
anaerobic speed reserve
maximum velocity in the 30-15 intermittent fitness test
soccer
acute response
individualized training
Language croatian
URN:NBN urn:nbn:hr:117:456001
Study programme Title: Kinesiology; specializations in: Kinesiology in Education and Track-and-Field, Kinesiology in Education and Fitness, Kinesiology in Education and Wrestling, Kinesiology in Education and Sailing, Kinesiology in Education and Windsurfing, Kinesiology in Education and Judo, Kinesiology in Education and Kayaking, Kinesiology in Education and Kinesiological Recreation, Kinesiology in Education and Kinesitherapy, Kinesiology in Education and Physical Conditioning of Athletes, Kinesiology in Education and Basketball, Kinesiology in Education and Football, Kinesiology in Education and Volleyball, Kinesiology in Education and Basic Kinesiological Transformations, Kinesiology in Education and Dancing, Kinesiology in Education and Swimming, Kinesiology in Education and Rhythmic Gymnastics, Kinesiology in Education and Handball, Kinesiology in Education and Skiing, Kinesiology in Education and Artistic Gymnastics, Kinesiology in Education and Management of Sport, Kinesiology in Education and Tennis, Kinesiology in Education and Rowing Course: Kinesiology in Education and Physical Conditioning of Athletes Study programme type: university Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate Academic / professional title: sveučilišni/sveučilišna magistar/magistra kineziologije u edukaciji (sveučilišni/sveučilišna magistar/magistra kineziologije u edukaciji)
Type of resource Text
File origin Born digital
Access conditions Open access
Terms of use
Created on 2024-10-09 07:31:11